Facial cues to physical strength are not always associated with facial masculinity: Comparative study of Europeans and Southern Siberians

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of our study was to compare morphometric patterns of facial sexual dimorphism with strength‐face relationship in members of two distinct populations of European and Central Asian origin: Russians and Tuvans.MethodsHandgrip strength (HGS) measures and facial photographs were collected from Russian (n = 233) and Tuvan (n = 187) men and women. We digitized 70 landmarks and semilandmarks on full‐face and 54 landmarks and semilandmarks on profile photos. This was done to capture variation in facial morphology. After that, we performed the shape regressions of landmarks' coordinates upon sex and HGS. Results were visualized in forms of thin‐plate deformation grids and geometric morphometric morphs.ResultsIn both populations, HGS was associated significantly with male facial shape only. In Russian men, strength‐related changes of facial shape were almost completely in direction of increase in male‐typicality. This was especially evident for the relative lower facial width, which was higher in men compared to women, as well as in stronger men compared to weaker ones. On the contrary, in Tuvans the lower face was relatively narrower in men than in women. However, the facial shape of strong Tuvan men was also associated with relatively wider lower face. Our results indicate that the effect of strength on facial shape is relatively independent of facial sexual dimorphism.ConclusionsOur findings clearly demonstrate that physical strength is associated with the shape of the lower part of male faces even in populations with a mismatched direction of lower face sexual dimorphism.