Affiliation:
1. School of Management Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi China
2. ERC for Process Mining of Manufacturing Services in Shaanxi Province Xi'an Shaanxi China
3. Faculty of Business University of Greenwich London United Kingdom
Abstract
AbstractThis paper investigates how product modularity affects a manufacturer's recovery strategy by constructing two trade‐in models: one with a module market and another without. Our results reveal that opening a module market is not always profitable for the manufacturer, except when the module production cost is extremely low. When opening it is less profitable, the manufacturer can boost profits by raising the module price, increasing salvage value, and reducing costs through remanufacturing. Regarding collection quantity, our findings reveal that a module market, particularly with high module costs and durability, increases trade‐in quantity, challenging the conventional expectations of market share erosion.
Reference68 articles.
1. Leasing, Modularity, and the Circular Economy
2. Trade-In Rebates for Price Discrimination and Product Recovery
3. The potential of modular product design on repair behavior and user experience – Evidence from the smartphone industry
4. Apple. (2023).Apple's self service repair. Retrieved January 14 2023 fromhttps://support.apple.com/en-gb/self-service-repair
5. Apple. (2024).Apple expands self service repair for Mac adds diagnostics and updates system configuration. Retrieved June 26 2024 fromhttps://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/02/apple-expands-self-service-repair-for-mac/