Assessment of spilled toxic bait by wild pigs and potential risk to non‐target species

Author:

Kinsey John C12ORCID,Foster Justin A1,Snow Nathan P3,Wishart Jason D4,Staples Linton D4,Bush Janis K2,VerCauteren Kurt C3

Affiliation:

1. Kerr Wildlife Management Area, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Hunt TX USA

2. Department of Integrative Biology The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle San Antonio TX USA

3. USDA/APHIS/ Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center Fort Collins CO USA

4. Animal Control Technologies Australia Pty Ltd Somerton VIC Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn 2018, a sodium nitrite (SN)‐based toxic bait for invasive wild pigs (hereafter wild pigs; Sus scrofa), was evaluated to determine its effectiveness in reducing local wild pig populations in Texas. Localized population reductions of >70% were achieved, but spillage of bait outside wild pig‐specific feeders (bait stations) caused by feeding wild pigs resulted in the deaths of non‐target animals. To evaluate risks to non‐target animals, we tested whether bait presentation influenced the total amount of bait spilled by wild pigs and estimated the associated risk to non‐target species.ResultsWe found that bait spilled outside bait stations could be reduced by >90% when compacted in trays, as opposed to being manually crumbled into pieces. We documented a mean spill rate of 0.913 g of bait per wild pig. Conservative risk assessments for nine non‐target species for which SN toxicity data exist indicate that there is relatively low risk of lethal exposure, apart from zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and white mice. Our results indicate that there may be enough spilled bait per feeding wild pig to kill 9.5 or 3.5 individuals of these species, respectively. Other species assessed range from 0.002 to 0.406 potential mortalities per wild pig.ConclusionWe demonstrated that the amount of bait spilled by wild pigs during feeding and the associated risk to non‐target animals can be minimized by presenting the bait compacted in trays within bait stations. We recommend that baits be tightly compacted and secured in bait stations to minimize risks to non‐target animals from spilled bait by wild pigs. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Funder

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Insect Science,Agronomy and Crop Science,General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Historical, current, and potential population size estimates of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States

2. Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states

3. TimmonsJB HigginbothamB LopezR CatheyJ MellishJ GriffinJet al. Feral hog population growth density and harvest in Texas. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Report. (Texas A&M University: College Station TX)(2012).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3