Approach to Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts

Author:

Macielak Robert J.1ORCID,Selleck Anne Morgan2,Kocharyan Armine1ORCID,Hunter Jacob B.3ORCID,Patro Ankita4ORCID,Perkins Elizabeth L.4ORCID,Hamilton Christopher A.5,Patel Neil S.5,Gurgel Richard K.5ORCID,Sweeney Alex D.6,Brown Kevin D.2,Link Michael J.17,Carlson Matthew L.17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

3. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

4. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee USA

5. Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

6. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

7. Department of Neurologic Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts to inform clinical practice.Study DesignHistorical cohort study.SettingTertiary referral centers.MethodsA multi‐institutional historical cohort of patients with VP shunts and CI was identified and analyzed.ResultsA total of 46 patients (median age 8 years [interquratile range, IQR: 2‐46]) with VP shunts and CI were identified. Of these, 41 (89%) patients had a VP shunt prior to CI. Based on institutional preference and individual patient factors, CI was performed contralateral to a pre‐existing VP shunt in 24 of these 41 cases (59%) and ipsilateral in 17 (41%). Furthermore, pre‐CI relocation of the VP shunt was performed in 3 cases (7%), and 2 patients (5%) underwent planned revision of their VP shunt concurrent with CI. In total, 2 of 27 pediatric patients (7%) required unanticipated revision shunt surgery, both contralateral to CI device placement, given VP shunt malfunction. One of 19 adult patients (5%) required shunt revision during CI due to shunt damage noted intraoperatively. Among 43 patients with available follow‐up, 38 (88%) are regular CI users, with a median consonant‐nucleus vowel‐consonant word: score of 58% (IQR: 28‐72).ConclusionCI can be performed at low risk, either contralateral or ipsilateral, to a VP shunt, and does not mandate shunt revision in most cases. Additional considerations regarding CI receiver‐stimulator placement are necessary with programmable shunts to mitigate device interaction. Preoperative planning, including coordination of care with neurosurgery, is important to achieving optimal outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3