Affiliation:
1. Institute of Mining Technology Guizhou University Guiyang Guizhou China
2. School of Chemical Engineering Qingdao University of Science and Technology Qingdao Shandong China
3. China University of Mining and Technology‐Beijing Beijing Beijing China
4. Xuanhua Science and Technology Vocational College Zhangjiakou Hebei China
Abstract
AbstractThe shape of a charge liner used in shaped charges with a combined liner will greatly influence the blasting effect. In this study, we examined how combined charge liners with different shapes affected directional rock blasting, and we assessed the influence mechanism. The numerical simulation results showed that among the three shaped charge liners, liners with arc and triangular shapes performed significantly better than the flat‐top liner, and the triangular liner was slightly superior to the arc‐shaped liner. Model testing indicated that principal cracks in the arc‐shaped and triangular liners developed along the combined energy‐gathering direction, while the principal cracks of the flat‐top liner deviated 32° from the axis. Therefore, the directional cracking effect of arc‐shaped and triangular liners was superior to the flat‐top liner. According to the peak strain values on the liners, the peak strain in the combined energy‐gathering direction was greater than that in the slot and nonenergy‐gathering directions, and the order of the peak strain of the three liners followed arc‐shaped liner > triangular liner > flat‐top liner. The directional blasting effect of the triangular liner was slightly better than the arc‐shaped liner. In conclusion, the findings of this study suggested that the best directional rock‐blasting effect was achieved when the shape of the combined charge liner was triangular.
Subject
General Energy,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献