Is the Presence of Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion Relevant for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse?

Author:

García‐Mejido José Antonio12ORCID,Martín‐Martinez Alicia3,García‐Jimenez Rocío4,González‐Diaz Enrique5,Núñez‐Matas María José6,Fernández‐Palacín Fernando7,Carballo‐Rastrilla Sonia3,Fernández‐Fernández Camino5,Sainz‐Bueno José Antonio12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Valme University Hospital Seville Spain

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine University of Seville Seville Spain

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Healthcare Complex of Gran Canaria Gran Canaria Spain

4. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department Juan Ramon Jiménez Hospital Huelva Spain

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Healthcare Complex of Leon (CAULE) Leon Spain

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital of Malaga Malaga Spain

7. Department of statistics and operational research University of Cadiz Cadiz Spain

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine if the addition of the assessment of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion to the measurement of the difference in the pubis‐uterine fundus distance between rest and with the Valsalva maneuver could increase the diagnostic capacity of ultrasound for uterine prolapse (UP).MethodsThis multicenter, observational and prospective study included 145 patients. Ultrasound assessment was performed, establishing the diagnosis of UP as a difference between the pubic‐uterine fundus distance at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver ≥15 mm (standard technique), while LAM avulsion was defined as an abnormal LAM insertion in three central slices using multislice ultrasound. A binary multivariate logistic regression model was made using nonautomated methods to predict surgical UP (general population, premenopausal, and postmenopausal patients), including the difference between the pubis‐uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver as well as LAM avulsion.ResultsA total of 143 patients completed the study. The addition of LAM avulsion criteria to the standard dynamic distance‐based protocol for the diagnosis of UP resulted in a higher sensitivity for the general population (79.7 vs 68.1%) as well as for premenopausal (89.3 vs 79.9%) and postmenopausal patients (76 vs 66.1%). In contrast, the standard technique showed a higher specificity than the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion for the general population (89.2 vs 74.3%) and premenopausal women (91.7 vs 63.2%). For postmenopausal patients, the model based on the standard technique associated with LAM avulsion had a higher sensitivity (76 vs 66.1%) and specificity (91.7 vs 86.8%) than the ultrasound diagnosis of UP.ConclusionThe implementation of the assessment of LAM avulsion in the ultrasound diagnosis of UP is useful in postmenopausal patients, increasing sensitivity and specificity relative to the ultrasound assessment based only on the difference between the pubis‐uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3