Preventing Another Fifty Years of Mass Incarceration: How Bioethics Can Help

Author:

Venters Homer

Abstract

AbstractIn the article “Fifty Years of U.S. Mass Incarceration and What It Means for Bioethics,” Sean Valles provides an important reminder of the consequences of mass incarceration in the United States and identifies potential roles for bioethicists in addressing this system. My limited view—that of a physician who conducts court‐ordered investigations and monitoring of health services behind bars—is that the ongoing failure of most academic and professional organizations to be more effective in this much‐ignored area stems from the lack of leaders and staff who have been directly impacted by mass incarceration. As conditions behind bars worsen, and a new war on drugs recoils the spring of mass incarceration, there is a pressing need to train, recruit, and promote people who know the realities of the criminal (and immigration) justice system and its impact on health and well‐being. This step can bring a more powerful engagement of bioethics regarding housing, employment, and health care and policing, as well as the numerous and harmful elements of jails, prisons, and detention settings. I provide examples of partners I learn from in this arena, as well as some discrete and technical areas for possible investigation.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science),Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

Reference8 articles.

1. Fifty Years of U.S. Mass Incarceration and What It Means for Bioethics

2. In these areas I have learned from the efforts of organizations like FAMM JustLeadership USA and The Bard Prison Initiative as models for training policy analysis and guidance.

3. In multiple settings I have encountered efforts to replace someone with lived experience as the prisoner representative on an institutional review board (IRB) with someone who runs a prison or jail. This would be a valuable and discrete research area—how the IRB can be coopted away from protecting a vulnerable group and what the consequences are.

4. California Department of Health Care Services “CalAIM Justice-Involved Advisory Group: Stakeholder Feedback on Draft Policy and Operations Guide ” June 29 2013 https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/provgovpart/pharmacy/Documents/CalAIM-JI-Stakeholder-Feedback-June-Advisory-Group6292023.pdf.

5. J.Christensen “Emergency Medical Association Rejects ‘Excited Delirium ’ Used to Describe Some Deaths in Police Custody ” CNN Health October 12 2023 https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/12/health/acep-rejects-excited-delirium-term/index.html; American Medical Association “New AMA Policy Opposes ‘Excited Delirium’ Diagnosis ” press release June 14 2021 https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/new-ama-policy-opposes-excited-delirium-diagnosis; C. Slevin and M. Brown “2nd Officer Acquitted in Death of Elijah McClain Who Was Put in a Neck Hold Given Ketamine ” Associated Press November 6 2023 https://apnews.com/article/elijah-mcclain-death-officers-trial-2dc1c1e2597eed1306581517d45c6630; J. Hesse “‘Weaponization of Medicine’: Police Use of Ketamine Draws Scrutiny after Elijah McClain's Death ”Guardian December 17 2021 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/17/ketamine-law-enforcement-deaths-custody-elijah-mcclain.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3