Association Between Limited English Proficiency and Hearing Healthcare Use in the United States

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine whether limited English proficiency (LEP) is associated with likelihood of prior audiogram and hearing aid use among US adults with hearing loss.MethodsThis cross‐sectional study of four merged National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles included 12,636 adults with subjective (self‐reported) or objective (audiometric) hearing loss. Subjects were classified as LEP if they completed the NHANES survey in a language other than English, or with the help of an interpreter. Likelihood of audiogram among participants with subjective and objective hearing loss, and likelihood of hearing aid use among participants with objective hearing loss were assessed using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression.ResultsIndividuals with LEP were less likely to have undergone audiogram among subjects with subjective (odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67–0.77), and objective (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.65–0.74) hearing loss. The association persisted for those with subjective hearing loss (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72–0.86), and objective hearing loss (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73–0.89) after adjusting for relevant covariates. Individuals with LEP were less likely to use hearing aids (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84–0.93). This association disappeared (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95–1.04) after adjustment.ConclusionLEP is associated with lower utilization of hearing healthcare services. This may be due to the complex interplay of socioeconomic and language disparities, which may act as barriers to hearing healthcare utilization. Individuals with LEP should be prioritized when designing interventions to improve accessibility to hearing healthcare.Level of EvidenceLevel 3 Laryngoscope, 2024