Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow‐up

Abstract

AbstractPurposeWhile restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cemented implants has been shown to provide a similar survivorship rate to mechanical alignment (MA) in the short term, no studies have reported on the long‐term survivorship and function.MethodsOne hundred four consecutive cemented cruciate retaining TKAs implanted using computer navigation and following the rKA principles proposed by Vendittoli were reviewed at a minimum of 10 years after surgery. Implant revisions, reoperations and clinical outcomes were assessed using knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), forgotten joint score (FJS), patients' satisfaction and joint perception questionnaires. Radiographs were analyzed to identify signs of osteolysis and implant loosening.ResultsImplant survivorship was 99.0% at a mean follow‐up of 11.3 years (range: 10.3–12.9) with one early revision for instability. Patients perceived their TKA as natural or artificial without limitation in 50.0% of cases, and 95.3% were satisfied or very satisfied with their TKA. The mean FJS was 67.6 (range: 0–100). The mean KOOS were as follows: pain 84.7 (range: 38–100), symptoms 85.5 (range: 46–100), function in daily activities 82.6 (range: 40–100), function in sport and recreation 35.2 (range: 0–100) and quality of life 79.1 (range: 0–100). No radiological evidence of implant aseptic loosening or osteolysis was identified.ConclusionCemented TKA implanted with the rKA alignment protocol demonstrated excellent long‐term implant survivorship and is a safe alternative to MA to improve patient function and satisfaction.Level of EvidenceIV, continuous case series with no comparison group.