Affiliation:
1. Wake Forest University
2. Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
3. New York University School of Global Public Health
Abstract
AbstractGeographical ancestry has been associated with an increased risk of various genetic conditions. Race and ethnicity often have been used as proxies for geographical ancestry. Despite numerous problems associated with the crude reliance on race and ethnicity as proxies for geographical ancestry, some genetic testing in the clinical, research, and employment settings has been and continues to be race‐ or ethnicity‐based. Race‐based or race‐targeted genetic testing refers to genetic testing offered only or primarily to people of particular racial or ethnic groups because of presumed differences among groups. One current example isAPOL1testing of Black kidney donors. Race‐based genetic testing raises numerous ethical and policy questions. Given the ongoing reliance on the Black race in genetic testing, it is important to understand the views of people who identify as Black or are identified as Black (including African American, Afro‐Caribbean, and Hispanic Black) regarding race‐based genetic testing that targets Black people because of their race. We conducted a systematic review of studies and reports of stakeholder‐engaged projects that examined how people who identify as or are identified as Black perceive genetic testing that specifically presumes genetic differences exist among racial groups or uses race as a surrogate for ancestral genetic variation and targets Black people. Our review identified 14 studies that explicitly studied this question and another 13 that implicitly or tacitly studied this matter. We found four main factors that contribute to a positive attitude toward race‐targeted genetic testing (facilitators) and eight main factors that are associated with concerns regarding race‐targeted genetic testing (barriers). This review fills an important gap. These findings should inform future genetic research and the policies and practices developed in clinical, research, public health, or other settings regarding genetic testing.
Funder
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Reference197 articles.
1. ACOG Committee Opinion #325
2. American Academy of Family Physicians. (2007).Summary of recommendations for clinical preventive services: Hemoglobinopathies. Revision 6.4.http://aile.net/sunum/dersnot/SDFM/22PHE_AAFP.pdf
3. The Influence of Health Care Policies and Health Care System Distrust on Willingness to Undergo Genetic Testing
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献