Impact of long‐COVID on the local and global efficiency of brain networks

Author:

Travi Fermín12ORCID,Hernández Micaela A.3,Bianchi Bruno12,Crivelli Lucía3,Allegri Ricardo F.3,Fernández Slezak Diego12,Calandri Ismael L.3,Kamienkowski Juan E.124

Affiliation:

1. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Departamento de Ciencias de la Computación Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

2. Laboratorio de Inteligencia Artificial Aplicada (LIAA) CONICET ‐ Universidad de Buenos Aires Instituto en Ciencias de la Computación (ICC) Buenos Aires Argentina

3. Departamento de Neurología Cognitiva FLENI Buenos Aires Argentina

4. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Maestría en Explotación de Datos y Descubrimiento del Conocimiento Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

Abstract

AbstractBackground and purposeSubjective cognitive complaints post‐COVID‐19, known as long‐COVID, have unclear effects on neural activity. This study explores the neural basis of these cognitive impairments by comparing resting‐state functional networks of long‐COVID individuals to a control group.MethodsForty‐two individuals with cognitive complaints persisting 24 weeks post COVID‐19 infection and 43 age‐, sex‐ and education‐matched healthy controls without a history of infection were studied using resting‐state functional MRI (rs‐fMRI) and the Uniform Data Set (UDS‐3) neurocognitive test battery (NCT). Neuropsychological scores were adjusted to the mean and grouped into seven cognitive composites. The rs‐fMRI data were partitioned into seven distinct functional neural networksSalience/Ventral Attention, Dorsal Attention, Default, Frontoparietal, Visual, Somatomotor, and Limbicand their efficiency, largest connected component, and modularity (Q) were studied.ResultsThe NCT scores yielded statistically significant differences in long‐COVID subjects compared to controls at attention, language, memory, executive, and global composites. We observed significant differences (p < .001) in the global and mean local efficiency of the Salience/Ventral Attention and Global networks, and to a lesser extent (p < .005 and p < .01) in the Default and Dorsal Attention networks.ConclusionsOur findings reveal significant group‐level differences in executive, attentional, language, and memory outcomes, alongside less efficient and organized connections among Salience/Ventral Attention and Global networks.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3