Affiliation:
1. Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Alcorcón Spain
2. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine Tufts University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA
3. Department of Neurology Hospital Quirón Pozuelo Madrid Spain
4. Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón Madrid Spain
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this clinical trial was to compare the outcomes of the application of ultrasound‐guided percutaneous nerve stimulation (PENS) targeting the median nerve versus surgery for improving pain and function in women with CTS.MethodsIn this randomized parallel‐group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04246216), 70 women with CTS were randomly allocated to either PENS (n = 35) or surgery (n = 35) group. Hand pain intensity (mean pain and the worst pain experienced) was the primary outcome. Functional status and symptoms severity (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, BCTQ) and self‐perceived improvement (Global Rating of Change, GROC) were the secondary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after each intervention. Analysis was performed with intention to treat with mixed ANCOVAs adjusted for baseline outcomes.ResultsAnalyses showed an adjusted advantage for PENS at 1 (Δ −2.0, 95% CI −2.9 to −1.1) and 3 (Δ −1.4, 95% CI −2.3 to −0.5) months for mean pain, at 1 (Δ −2.2, 95% CI −3.3 to −1.1), 3 (Δ −1.75, 95% CI −2.9 to −0.6) and 6 (Δ −1.7, 95% CI −2.8 to −0.6) months in the worst pain intensity, and at 1 (Δ −0.95, 95% CI −1.1 to −0.8), 3 (Δ −0.55, 95% CI −0.8 to −0.3) and 6 (Δ −0.4, 95% CI −0.6 to −0.8) months in function. Both groups exhibited similar changes in symptom severity. Both groups reported similar improvement at 12 months in all outcomes. Symptoms and function improved in both groups, with PENS leading to better short‐term outcomes than surgery.ConclusionThis clinical trial confirms that PENS applied with current understanding of pain mechanisms in CTS is as useful as surgery in women with CTS without denervation. The potential placebo effect of both interventions should not be ignored.SignificanceThe application of percutaneous nerve stimulation was more effective at short‐term, but similar effective at mid and long‐term, than surgery in women with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference40 articles.
1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Work Group Panel. (2012).Clinical practice guideline on the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Accessed on 15 January 2015. Available at:www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/CTStreatmentguide.asp
2. Practice parameter: Electro‐diagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome;American Association of Electro‐diagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, American Academy of physical medicine and rehabilitation;Neurology,2002
3. Efficacy of Physical Therapy on Nociceptive Pain Processing Alterations in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
4. Acupuncture and related interventions for the treatment of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome;Choi G. H.;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2018
5. Longitudinal excursion and strain in the median nerve during novel nerve gliding exercises for carpal tunnel syndrome
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献