Strategies for low limit maintenance thresholds and condition states for bridge structures

Author:

Strauss Alfred1,Bergmeister Konrad1,Vliet Agnieszka Bigaj‐van2,Daró Paola3,Zimmermann Thomas4,van Meerveld Hendrik2

Affiliation:

1. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna

2. TNO the Netherlands

3. Sacertis Ingegneria S.r.l. Italy

4. City of Vienna, Building Inspection

Abstract

AbstractThe objectives of asset management are to ensure secure service of the objects and/or network, to preserve the infrastructure capital and to maintain the function through their life cycle. Maintenance activities should preserve the performance and future serviceability in such way that an adequate level of reliability with respect to performance requirements applicable to the structure under consideration is preserved. Hence adequate and low limit maintenance should guarantee reliability, safety functionality, availability, maintainability, health and security, as well as environmental and economic performance at the politically agreed level of service. In order to arrange resources, the concept of condition‐states and minimum maintenance thresholds are widely used in context of maintenance planning in many European countries. However, there is no uniform approach defining and rating the condition‐states and setting the low limit maintenance thresholds. In general, national authorities or individual operators are using their own developments which consequently lead to different levels of service. In many cases, the models and criteria used are based on country‐specific experience with implementation of condition‐based maintenance strategies. Moreover, in some European countries, preventive maintenance uses both condition‐based and scheduled maintenance strategy, with certain maintenance measures carried out in a condition‐based manner and some other measures are planned/fixed at certain intervals. In this contribution based on the outcomes of IM‐SAFE project, maintenance concepts, condition‐state definitions and low limit thresholds of maintenance strategies of European countries will be presented, discussed and compared. In addition, a special focus is given to apply sustainable measures and to develop maintenance strategies respecting the European green deal scopes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference8 articles.

1. KeβlerS. LimongelliM.P. ApostolidiE. StraussA. SousaH. KużawaM. ChatziE. BramlT. ZimmertF.: (2022):Existing concrete structures: Life Management Testing and Structural Health Monitoring.[fib-Symposium Oslo 12. Juni ‐ 16. Juni 2022] In: fib Proceedings fib Congress 2022 Oslo ‐ Concrete Innovation for Sustainability

2. H2020 CSA IM‐SAFE. (2022)Appraisal of methods for safety evaluation and risk management.https://imsafe-project.eu/

3. H2020 CSA IM‐SAFE. (2022)Background materials for implementation of decision‐making regarding maintenance strategies.https://im-safe-project.eu/

4. Rashidi M. Lemass B.(2011)A Decision Support Methodolo‐gy for Remediation Planning of Concrete Bridges.KICEM Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management Vol.1 No.2 p.1–10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3