Key performance requirements for objective assessment & through‐life management of structures

Author:

Strauss Alfred1,Bergmeister Konrad1,Vliet Agnieszka Bigaj‐van2,Rodríguez Ana Sánchez3,Daró Paola4,Zimmermann Thomas5

Affiliation:

1. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna

2. TNO the Netherlands

3. University of Vigo Spain

4. Sacertis Ingegneria S.r.l. Italy

5. City of Vienna, Building Inspection

Abstract

AbstractThe overall process in the life cycle assessment is the condition control of new or existing structures respectively. This is necessary for safeguarding the condition of a structure during its lifetime, and includes condition survey, performance assessment as well as for the evaluation of maintenance strategies. Usually deterministic performance prediction models that describe the future condition through a functional correlation between structure condition characteristics, such as the age of the structure, and the characteristics of mechanical, chemical and physical processes are used to capture the deterioration processes in the life cycle analyses. With increasing experience with the use of surveying technologies for acquiring information related to the current condition of bridges there is an ongoing shift towards data‐informed approaches to condition control. The identification and implementation of key performance indicators may improve existing assessment methods within management system of transport infrastructure. The IM‐SAFE project aims to characterize and systematize performance indicators for bridges. Based on these project outcomes, in this contribution, the systematized performance indicators for bridge systems are be presented and a case study is used to show how performance indicators can be coupled with risk‐based performance requirements, data‐informed assessment methods, inspection and monitoring concepts.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference12 articles.

1. Stochastische Parameteridentifikation bei Konstruktionsbeton für die Betonerhaltung

2. Ansatz zur Beurteilung von chloridbelasteten Stahlbetonbauwerken mit Bewertung der Restlebensdauer

3. H2020 CSA IM‐SAFE. (2022) Appraisal of methods for safety evaluation and risk management.https://im-safe-project.eu/

4. H2020 CSA IM‐SAFE. (2022)Background materials for implementation of decision‐making regarding maintenance strategies.https://im-safe-project.eu/

5. Zanini M.(2019)State‐of‐research on performance indicators for bridge quality control and management. Frontiers in Built Environment p.22.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3