Affiliation:
1. National Park Service, Northeast Temperate Network and Mid‐Atlantic Network P.O. Box 177 Bar Harbor Maine 04609 USA
2. National Park Service, Eastern Rivers and Mountains Network 420 Forest Resources Building University Park Pennsylvania 16802 USA
3. National Park Service, National Capital Region Network 4598 MacArthur Boulevard NW Washington DC 20007 USA
4. National Park Service, Northeast Temperate Network 54 Elm Street Woodstock Vermont 05091 USA
5. National Park Service, Region 1 Inventory and Monitoring Division 120 Chatham Lane Fredericksburg Virginia 22405 USA
6. Schoodic Institute at Acadia National Park P.O. Box 277 Winter Harbor Maine 04693 USA
Abstract
AbstractAdvanced regeneration, in the form of tree seedlings and saplings, is critical for ensuring the long‐term viability and resilience of forest ecosystems in the eastern United States. Lack of regeneration and/or compositional mismatch between regeneration and canopy layers, called regeneration debt, can lead to shifts in forest composition, structure, and, in extreme cases, forest loss. In this study, we examined status and trends in regeneration across 39 national parks from Virginia to Maine, spanning 12 years to apply the regeneration debt concept. We further refined the concept by adding new metrics and classifying results into easily interpreted categories adapted from the literature: imminent failure, probable failure, insecure, and secure. We then used model selection to determine the potential drivers most influencing patterns of regeneration debt. Status and trends indicated widespread regeneration debt in eastern national parks, with 27 of 39 parks classified as imminent or probable failure. Deer browse impact was consistently the strongest predictor of regeneration abundance. The most pervasive component of regeneration debt observed across parks was a sapling bottleneck, characterized by critically low sapling density of native canopy species and significant declines in native canopy sapling basal area or density for most parks. Regeneration mismatches also threaten forest resilience in many parks, where native canopy seedlings and saplings were outnumbered by native subcanopy species, particularly species that are less palatable deer browse. The devastating impact of emerald ash borer eliminating ash as a native canopy tree also drove regeneration mismatches in many parks that contain abundant ash regeneration, demonstrating the vulnerability of forests that lack diverse understories to invasive pests and pathogens. These findings underscore the critical importance of an integrated forest management approach that promotes an abundant and diverse regeneration layer. In most cases, this can only be achieved through long‐term (i.e., multidecadal) management of white‐tailed deer and invasive plants. Small‐scale disturbances that increase structural complexity may also promote regeneration where stress from deer and invasive plants is minimal. Without immediate and sustained management intervention, the forest loss we are already observing may become a widespread pattern in eastern national parks and the broader region.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献