The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study

Published:2016-10-18 Issue:3 Volume:77 Page:263-273
ISSN:0270-4137
Container-title:The Prostate
language:en
Short-container-title:Prostate

Author:

Dell'Oglio Paolo¹²,Karnes Robert Jeffrey³,Gandaglia Giorgio¹,Fossati Nicola¹,Stabile Armando¹,Moschini Marco¹³,Cucchiara Vito¹,Zaffuto Emanuele¹,Karakiewicz Pierre I.²,Suardi Nazareno¹,Montorsi Francesco¹,Briganti Alberto¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI; Urological Research Institute; IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Milan Italy

2. Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit; University of Montreal Health Center; Montreal Canada

3. Department of Urology; Mayo Clinic; Rochester Minnesota

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology,Oncology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/pros.23265/fullpdf

Reference25 articles.

1. The histology and prognosis of prostatic cancer;Mellinger;J Urol,1967

2. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging;Gleason;J Urol,1974

3. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma;Epstein;Am J Surg Pathol,2005