Is subsurface soil a chemically more hostile zone for deep‐placed phosphorus fertilizer?

Abstract

AbstractThe susceptibility of surface soil to drying when rainfall is scarce has prompted evaluation of deeper placement (20 cm) of fertilizers within the profile to where soil moisture is more likely to be stored. However, concerns arise regarding potential chemical challenges to P availability in the subsurface. This study examined differences in chemical conditions between the soil surface (0–10 cm) and subsurface (15–25 cm), and investigated the effect on the diffusion and extractability of banded P. Analysis of surface and subsurface samples from 15 sites revealed substantial differences in characteristics that influence P behavior between depths. The phosphorus buffering index (PBI) was largely explained by concentrations of amorphous Al and Fe (hydr)oxides and CaCO3. The measured diffusion distance of P from monoammonium phosphate (MAP) granules was found to be inversely related to PBI. Consequently, significant differences in diffusion distances were typically observed between soil layers characterized by marked PBI variations. The measured diffusion radii were used to calculate the mean P concentrations of surface‐banded and deep‐banded MAP in a field scenario, which were replicated in a 4‐week laboratory incubation. The resulting lability of applied P was determined through isotopic exchange, and although significantly higher P recoveries were measured from the subsurface at two sites where large pH differences existed between depths, no significant differences were measured between depths at all other sites. Hence, the subsurface is not a more hostile zone for deep‐placed P.