Evaluating posttraumatic stress in young adult cancer survivors: Implications of revised DSM‐5 traumatic event criteria

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Psychiatric Diagnoses (DSM‐5) significantly narrowed conditions under which life‐threatening illnesses meet qualifying traumatic event (QTE) criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To investigate the impact of this change on identification of PTSD in young adult cancer survivors (YACS), we compared prevalence of QTE exposure using DSM‐5 and earlier DSM‐IV criteria.MethodsThe Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM‐5 (SCID‐5) was customized for study goals and administered to a convenience sample of 250 YACS ages 18–40 followed at a single cancer center.ResultsThe SCID‐5 was well‐tolerated by participants and estimated duration was brief (33 min; range 12–75). Only 35 interviews (14%) presented complex scoring questions. 168 participants (67.2%) identified cancer as their “most stressful or traumatic experience.” Applying DSM‐IV criteria, 227 YACS (90.8%) reported any QTEs; prevalence was significantly reduced following more restrictive DSM‐5 QTE criteria, with only 124 YACS (49.6%) reporting ≥1 QTE (z = −9.68, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe SCID‐5 can be successfully adapted to assess QTEs in YACS following both DSM‐IV and DSM‐5 criteria. DSM‐5 criteria significantly limit prevalence of QTE exposures compared with DSM‐IV. As the majority of YACS identify cancer as their most stressful life event, it is critically important to investigate its impact on their psychological functioning. Until more is known about how PTSD symptoms may arise after cancer, clinicians and researchers should adapt PTSD assessments to systematically evaluate the role of cancer as a traumatic event that may lead to PTSD symptoms in YACS.