Randomized clinical trial to determine the effect of nasogastric drainage on tracheal acid aspiration following oesophagectomy

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to investigate tracheal acid aspiration after oesophagectomy and to determine whether it is influenced by nasogastric (NG) drainage. Methods Thirty-four patients undergoing oesophagectomy were randomized to one of three methods of NG drainage: a single-lumen tube with free drainage and 4-hourly aspiration, a sump-type tube on continuous suction drainage, or no NG tube. A tracheal pH probe was used to collect information on acid aspiration for 48 h after surgery. A pH < 5·5 was considered abnormal (normal pH 6·8–7·2). Total time with tracheal pH < 5·5, number of reflux episodes and longest reflux time were compared between groups. Results There was significant and persistent tracheal acid aspiration in all patients. Patients with a sump-type tube had a significantly shorter total time with tracheal pH < 5·5 than those in the other groups (sump-type tube versus single-lumen tube, P = 0·0069; sump-type tube versus no tube, P = 0·0071). Patients randomized to no NG tube experienced more respiratory complications after surgery than those who had either single-lumen or sump-type tubes (seven of 12 versus four of 22 patients; P = 0·023). Insertion of a NG tube was necessary in the first week after surgery in seven of 12 patients in this group. Conclusion Routine NG drainage after oesophagectomy is necessary. A sump-type NG tube is better at preventing tracheal acid aspiration and may reduce the incidence of respiratory complications.