Unraveling non‐participation in genomic research: A complex interplay of barriers, facilitators, and sociocultural factors

Author:

McConkie‐Rosell Allyn1ORCID,Spillmann Rebecca C.1,Schoch Kelly1,Sullivan Jennifer A.1,Walley Nicole1,McDonald Marie1,Hooper Stephen R.2,Shashi Vandana1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Division of Medical Genetics Department of Pediatrics Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Health System Durham North Carolina USA

2. Department of Allied Health Sciences School of Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractAlthough genomic research offering next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has increased the diagnoses of rare/ultra‐rare disorders, populations experiencing health disparities infrequently participate in these studies. The factors underlying non‐participation would most reliably be ascertained from individuals who have had the opportunity to participate, but decline. We thus enrolled parents of children and adult probands with undiagnosed disorders who had declined genomic research offering NGS with return of results with undiagnosed disorders (Decliners, n = 21) and compared their data to those who participated (Participants, n = 31). We assessed: (1) practical barriers and facilitators, (2) sociocultural factors—genomic knowledge and distrust, and (3) the value placed upon a diagnosis by those who declined participation. The primary findings were that residence in rural and medically underserved areas (MUA) and higher number of barriers were significantly associated with declining participation in the study. Exploratory analyses revealed multiple co‐occurring practical barriers, greater emotional exhaustion and research hesitancy in the parents in the Decliner group compared to the Participants, with both groups identifying a similar number of facilitators. The parents in the Decliner group also had lower genomic knowledge, but distrust of clinical research was not different between the groups. Importantly, despite their non‐participation, those in the Decliner group indicated an interest in obtaining a diagnosis and expressed confidence in being able to emotionally manage the ensuing results. Study findings support the concept that some families who decline participation in diagnostic genomic research may be experiencing pile‐up with exhaustion of family resources – making participation in the genomic research difficult. This study highlights the complexity of the factors that underlie non‐participation in clinically relevant NGS research. Thus, approaches to mitigating barriers to NGS research participation by populations experiencing health disparities need to be multi‐pronged and tailored so that they can benefit from state‐of ‐the art genomic technologies.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3