Experiences of living with hip osteoarthritis and of receiving advice, education and ultrasound‐guided intra‐articular hip injection in the hip injection trial. A qualitative study

Author:

Holden Melanie Ann1ORCID,Hawarden Ashley12,Paskins Zoe12,Roddy Edward12,Mallen Christian D.1,Liddle Jennifer3,Bourton Amy4,Jinks Clare1,

Affiliation:

1. Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis School of Medicine Keele University Keele UK

2. Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Stoke‐on‐Trent UK

3. Population Health Sciences Institute Newcastle University Newcastle Upon Tyne UK

4. Centre for Academic Primary Care Lifespan and Population Health School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe Hip Injection Trial (HIT) compared the effectiveness of adding a single ultrasound‐guided intra‐articular injection of either corticosteroid and local anaesthetic or local anaesthetic alone to advice and education among people with hip osteoarthritis (OA). This nested qualitative study explored participants' experiences of living with hip OA and of the trial treatment they received.MethodSemi‐structured telephone interviews were undertaken with a purposeful sample of trial participants after a 2‐month trial follow‐up. Interviewers were blinded to which injection participants had received. Thematic analysis using constant comparison was undertaken prior to knowing the trial results.Results34 trial participants were interviewed across all arms. OA causes pain, physical limitations, difficulties at work, lowered mood, and disrupted sleep. Those who received advice and education alone felt that they had not received ‘treatment’ and described little/no benefit. Participants in both injection groups described marked improvements in pain, physical function, and other aspects of life (e.g., sleep, confidence). The perceived magnitude of benefit appeared greater among those who received the corticosteroid injection; however, the length of benefit varied in both injection groups. There was uncertainty about the longer‐term benefits of injection and repeated injections.ConclusionHip OA is highly burdensome. Participants perceived little/no benefit from advice and education alone but reported marked improvements when combined with either injection. However, the magnitude of benefit was greater among those who received corticosteroid. The varying duration of response to injection and uncertainty regarding longer‐term benefits of injection and repeated injections suggests that these areas are important for future research.Trial registration: EudraCT 2014‐003412‐37; ISRCTN50550256.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nursing (miscellaneous),Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Chiropractics,Rheumatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3