Risk-adjusted prediction of operative mortality in oesophagogastric surgery with O-POSSUM

Author:

Tekkis P P1,McCulloch P2,Poloniecki J D3,Prytherch D R4,Kessaris N5,Steger A C6

Affiliation:

1. Academic Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK

2. Academic Unit of Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

3. Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK

4. Department of Information Systems, University of Portsmouth/Portsmouth Hospitals, Portsmouth, UK

5. Department of Surgery, Kent and Sussex Hospital, Tunbridge Wells, UK

6. Department of Surgery, Lewisham Hospital, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The present study was designed to develop a dedicated oesophagogastric model for the prediction of risk-adjusted postoperative mortality in upper gastrointestinal surgery (O-POSSUM). Methods Using 1042 patients undergoing oesophageal (n = 538) or gastric (n = 504) surgery between 1994 and 2000 the Portsmouth predictor equation for mortality (P-POSSUM) scoring system was compared with a standard logistic regression O-POSSUM model and a multilevel O-POSSUM model using the following independent factors: age, physiological status, mode of surgery, type of surgery and histological stage. Results The overall mortality rate was 12·0 per cent (elective mortality rate 9·4 per cent and emergency mortality rate 26·9 per cent). P-POSSUM overpredicted mortality (14·5 per cent), particularly in the elective group of patients. The multilevel model offered higher discrimination than the single-level O-POSSUM and P-POSSUM models (area under receiver–operator characteristic curve 79·7 versus 74·6 and 74·3 per cent). When observed to expected outcomes were evaluated, the multilevel O-POSSUM model was found to offer better calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow χ2 statistic 10·15 versus 10·52 and 28·80). Conclusion The multilevel O-POSSUM model provided an accurate risk-adjusted prediction of death from oesophageal and gastric surgery for individual patients. In conjunction with a multidisciplinary approach to patient management, the model may be used in everyday practice for perioperative counselling of patients and their carers.

Funder

Royal College of Surgeons of England

University Hospital Aintree Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Reference29 articles.

1. Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: I. A critical review of surgery;Earlam;Br J Surg,1980

2. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma;Muller;Br J Surg,1990

3. Surgery and current management for cancer of the esophagus and cardia. Part 1;DeMeester;Curr Probl Surg,1988

4. A comparison of outcome after resection for squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and cardia;Law;Surg Gynecol Obstet,1992

5. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit;Copeland;Br J Surg,1991

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3