Clinical commissioning of the first point‐of‐care spectral photon‐counting CT for the upper extremities

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAcceptance testing and quality assurance (QA) of computed tomography (CT) scans are of great importance to ensure the appropriate performance of the systems. However, current standards and guidelines do not include a dedicated QA program for spectral photon‐counting CT (SPCCT), nor adapted tolerance levels.PurposeTo evaluate the technical performance, in terms of image quality and radiation dose, of the first point‐of‐care SPCCT for the upper extremities (MARS Extremity 5X120, MARS Bioimaging Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand) and to establish a comprehensive QA program.MethodsThe specific dimensions of the scanner with a 125 mm diameter gantry and a small voxel size of 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm3 require the use of suitable phantoms and evaluation techniques. Indicators such as CT number accuracy, image noise, uniformity, and slice thickness were assessed to characterize the image quality. The in‐plane and longitudinal spatial resolutions were evaluated by means of the modulation transfer function (MTF). Noise power spectra (NPS) were calculated to further evaluate the image noise. Material identification capabilities were assessed using clinically relevant high‐Z materials (iodine, gold, gadolinium, and calcium). A 100‐mm diameter CTDI‐like phantom was used to measure the dose indices. A complete radiation survey was carried out to measure the radiation exposure at different points around the scanner.ResultsThe proposed QA program is based on international and local recommendations as well as practical experience. It includes standardised CT tests and SPCCT‐specific methods. Additional methodologies to further assess the system performance are also presented. Tolerance levels are discussed and revised when appropriate. Both in‐plane and longitudinal high spatial resolutions were evidenced by the MTF measurements with 1.8 lp· mm−1 and 5.0 lp· mm−1 at 10%, respectively. The calculated effective slice thickness ranged between 0.15 and 0.16 mm for the five energy bins and for a reconstructed voxel size of 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm3. Reference values of the linear attenuation coefficient of water have been calculated and used to assess the CT number uniformity of water. Evaluation of the CT number accuracy and stability of various clinically relevant materials showed excellent spectral correlation and linearity between HU values and concentrations (r2 > 0.99). The NPS showed less noise correlation between slices than within transverse slice, as well as a systematic increase at low spatial frequencies. The volume CT dose index (CTDI) for a custom‐made 100 mm diameter phantom was 9.32 mGy. Radiation measurements around the scanner showed that it is completely shielded except for the access port, and that no additional protective measures are necessary for the patient.ConclusionsA routine QA framework for SPCCT systems has been proposed. Image quality and radiation dose were assessed using newly designed phantoms, relevant metrics, and automated algorithms. Baseline values were established and tolerance levels discussed for the MARS SPCCT scanner based on collected data and international recommendations.