Efficacy and safety of the proposed bevacizumab biosimilar BAT1706 compared with reference bevacizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer: A randomized, double‐blind, phase III study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBAT1706 is a proposed biosimilar of bevacizumab (Avastin®). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of BAT1706 with that of EU‐sourced reference bevacizumab (EU‐bevacizumab) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to BAT1706 plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (BAT1706 arm) or EU‐bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (EU‐bevacizumab arm) given every 3 weeks for six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with BAT1706 or EU‐bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at week 18 (ORR18). Clinical equivalence was demonstrated if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the BAT1706:EU‐bevacizumab ORR18 risk ratio was contained within the predefined equivalence margins of 0.75–1.33 (China National Medical Products Administration requirements), or 0.73–1.36 (US Food and Drug Administration), or if the 95% CI of the ORR18 risk difference between treatments was contained within the predefined equivalence margin of −0.12 to 0.15 (EMA requirements).ResultsIn total, 649 randomized patients (BAT1706, n = 325; EU‐bevacizumab, n = 324) received at least one cycle of combination treatment. The ORR18 was comparable between the BAT1706 and EU‐bevacizumab arms (48.0% and 44.5%, respectively). The ORR18 risk ratio of 1.08 (90% CI: 0.94–1.24) and the ORR18 risk difference of 0.03 (95% CI: −0.04 to 0.11) were within the predefined equivalence margins, demonstrating the biosimilarity of BAT1706 and EU‐bevacizumab. The safety profile of BAT1706 was consistent with that of EU‐bevacizumab and no new safety signals were observed.ConclusionIn patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, BAT1706 demonstrated clinical equivalence to EU‐bevacizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.