A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials

Published:2002 Issue:11 Volume:21 Page:1625-1634
ISSN:0277-6715
Container-title:Statistics in Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Statist. Med.

Author:

Hopewell S.,Clarke M.,Lusher A.,Lefebvre C.,Westby M.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Statistics and Probability,Epidemiology

Reference16 articles.

1. Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews

2. The Cochrane Collaboration

3. Identifying randomised trials. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context, (eds). BMJ Publishing: London, 2001; 69-86.

4. Search strategies for finding RCTs in MEDLINE. In An Evidence-based Health Care System: the Case for Clinical Trials Registries. National Institutes of Health, Office of Medical Applications of Research: Bethesda, Maryland, 1994; 23-28.

Cited by 94 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Patients’ Demographics and Risk Factors in Voice Disorders: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews;Journal of Voice;2024-03

2. A Tailored Approach: A model for literature searching in complex systematic reviews;Journal of Information Science;2022-09-16

3. Pharmacotherapy for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD);Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2022-03-02

4. Mal/adaptations: A qualitative evidence synthesis of opioid agonist therapy during major disruptions;International Journal of Drug Policy;2022-03

5. A multiyear systematic survey of the quality of reporting for randomised trials in dentistry, neurology and geriatrics published in journals of Spain and Latin America;BMC Medical Research Methodology;2021-07-26