AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor‐neutral reject analysis in radiography

Author:

Little Kevin1ORCID,Reiser Ingrid2,Apgar Bruce3,Dalal Poonam4,Dave Jaydev5,Fisher Ryan6,Hulme Katie7,Jafari Mary Ellen8,Marshall Emily2ORCID,Meyer Stephen9,Moore Quentin10,Murphy Nicole11,Nishino Thomas12ORCID,Nye Katelyn4,O'Donnell Kevin13,Sabol John4,Sanchez Adrian14,Sensakovic William15,Tarbox Lawrence16,Uzenoff Robert17,Walz‐Flannigan Alisa18,Willis Charles13,Zhang Jie19

Affiliation:

1. Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

2. The University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

3. AGFA HealthCare Greenville South Carolina USA

4. GE Healthcare Chicago Illinois USA

5. Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

6. The MetroHealth System Cleveland Ohio USA

7. Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

8. Atlantic Health System Morristown New Jersey USA

9. Canon Medical Components USA Irvine California USA

10. Mercy College of Ohio Toledo Ohio USA

11. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

12. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

13. Canon Medical Research USA Vernon Hills Illinois USA

14. Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee USA

15. Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA

16. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Little Rock Arkansas USA

17. Fujifilm Medical Systems USA Lexington Massachusetts USA

18. Marshfield Clinic Marshfield Wisconsin USA

19. University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA

Abstract

AbstractReject rate analysis is considered an integral part of a diagnostic radiography quality control (QC) program. A rejected image is a patient radiograph that was not presented to a radiologist for diagnosis and that contributes unnecessary radiation dose to the patient. Reject rates that are either too high or too low may suggest systemic department shortcomings in QC mechanisms. Due to the lack of standardization, reject data often cannot be easily compared between radiography systems from different vendors. The purpose of this report is to provide guidance to help standardize data elements that are required for comprehensive reject analysis and to propose data reporting and workflows to enable an effective and comprehensive reject rate monitoring program. Essential data elements, a proposed schema for classifying reject reasons, and workflow implementation options are recommended in this task group report.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Radiation

Reference28 articles.

1. Best practices in digital radiography;DeMaio DN;Radiol Technol,2019

2. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report 99 – Quality Assurance for Diagnostic Imaging.U.S. Dept. of Commerce National Bureau of Standards;1988.

3. Quality Control in Diagnostic Radiology

4. Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 151

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3