Clinical assessment of a novel machine‐learning automated contouring tool for radiotherapy planning

Author:

Hu Yunfei1ORCID,Nguyen Huong2,Smith Claire2,Chen Tom3,Byrne Mikel4,Archibald‐Heeren Ben1,Rijken James5,Aland Trent2

Affiliation:

1. Icon Cancer Centre Concord Rusty Priest Building Concord Repatriation Hospital Concord NSW Australia

2. ICON Core Office South Brisbane QLD Australia

3. Icon Cancer Centre Springfield Cancer Care Centre Mater Private Hospital 30 Health Care Dr Springfield Queensland Australia

4. Icon Cancer Centre Wahroonga Sydney Adventist Hospital Sydney Australia

5. Icon Cancer Centre Windsor Gardens Windsor Gardens South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractContouring has become an increasingly important aspect of radiotherapy due to inverse planning. Several studies have suggested that the clinical implementation of automated contouring tools can reduce inter‐observer variation while increasing contouring efficiency, thereby improving the quality of radiotherapy treatment and reducing the time between simulation and treatment. In this study, a novel, commercial automated contouring tool based on machine learning, the AI‐Rad Companion Organs RT™ (AI‐Rad) software (Version VA31) (Siemens Healthineers, Munich, Germany), was assessed against both manually delineated contours and another commercially available automated contouring software, Varian Smart Segmentation™ (SS) (Version 16.0) (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, United States). The quality of contours generated by AI‐Rad in Head and Neck (H&N), Thorax, Breast, Male Pelvis (Pelvis_M), and Female Pelvis (Pevis_F) anatomical areas was evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively using several metrics. A timing analysis was subsequently performed to explore potential time savings achieved by AI‐Rad. Results showed that most automated contours generated by AI‐Rad were not only clinically acceptable and required minimal editing, but also superior in quality to contours generated by SS in multiple structures. In addition, timing analysis favored AI‐Rad over manual contouring, indicating the largest time saving (753s per patient) in the Thorax area. AI‐Rad was concluded to be a promising automated contouring solution that generated clinically acceptable contours and achieved time savings, thereby greatly benefiting the radiotherapy process.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Radiation

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3