Consensus on the definition and assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials: A Delphi study

Author:

Jung Andres12ORCID,Braun Tobias34ORCID,Armijo‐Olivo Susan56ORCID,Challoumas Dimitris7ORCID,Luedtke Kerstin18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), Institute of Health Sciences Universität zu Lübeck Lübeck Germany

2. Department of Sport Science and Sport Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen Germany

3. Department of Applied Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences) Bochum Germany

4. Department of Health HSD Hochschule Döpfer (University of Applied Sciences) Cologne Germany

5. Faculty of Business and Social Sciences Hochschule Osnabrück‐University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück Germany

6. Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Research Center University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

7. Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation University of Glasgow Glasgow UK

8. Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM) Universität zu Lübeck Lübeck Germany

Abstract

AbstractExternal validity is an important parameter that needs to be considered for decision making in health research, but no widely accepted measurement tool for the assessment of external validity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exists. One of the most limiting factors for creating such a tool is probably the substantial heterogeneity and lack of consensus in this field. The objective of this study was to reach consensus on a definition of external validity and on criteria to assess the external validity of RCTs included in systematic reviews. A three‐round online Delphi study was conducted. The development of the Delphi survey was based on findings from a previous systematic review. Potential panelists were identified through a comprehensive web search. Consensus was reached when at least 67% of the panelists agreed to a proposal. Eighty‐four panelists from different countries and various disciplines participated in at least one round of this study. Consensus was reached on the definition of external validity (“External validity is the extent to which results of trials provide an acceptable basis for generalization to other circumstances such as variations in populations, settings, interventions, outcomes, or other relevant contextual factors”), and on 14 criteria to assess the external validity of RCTs in systematic reviews. The results of this Delphi study provide a consensus‐based reference standard for future tool development. Future research should focus on adapting, pilot testing, and validating these criteria to develop measurement tools for the assessment of external validity.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3