Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA
2. Department of Pharmacy Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital St. Petersburg Florida USA
3. Department of Hematology St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA
4. Department of Pediatrics University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis Tennessee USA
5. Department of Infectious Diseases St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundUp to 10% of children are reported to be allergic to penicillin, but many allergy labels are unverified and may require formal testing. Inaccurate drug allergy labels are associated with a range of adverse clinical outcomes. Patients with hematological disorders may experience frequent and severe infections; those who have been incorrectly labeled penicillin allergic may benefit from allergy de‐labeling (ADL) efforts to facilitate access to beta‐lactam antibiotics. We developed a multidisciplinary, pharmacist‐driven process that enabled non‐allergist trained providers to assess and de‐label penicillin allergies in a pediatric hematology center.MethodsVolunteers, including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and pharmacists, were trained in skin testing and oral challenge procedures. Patients were identified by review of electronic medical records for penicillin or penicillin‐derivative allergy. Patient and family interviews were conducted in cases where a true penicillin allergy was deemed uncertain based on chart review. If allergy could not be de‐labeled by chart review or interview alone, patients were offered skin and/or oral challenge testing.ResultsFifty‐nine patients were initially labeled as penicillin allergic. Allergy labels of 11 (19%) were removed by chart review only, and 15 (25%) after conducting interviews. A total of two (3%) patients were ineligible due to contraindications, and five (9%) declined participation. Twenty‐six patients (44%) underwent allergy testing (50% skin testing, 50% oral challenge) of which 23 (88%) were negative.ConclusionsADL was possible in most patients previously identified as penicillin allergic. Testing was well tolerated with no serious adverse effects.
Funder
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities