Affiliation:
1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
2. Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Rehabilitation & Development Amsterdam The Netherlands
3. Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center/Reade Amsterdam The Netherlands
4. Department of Allied Health Professions Fontys University of Applied Science Eindhoven The Netherlands
5. Merem Medische Revalidatie Hilversum The Netherlands
6. Loopvisie b.v. Lelystad The Netherlands
7. Livit Orthopedie Amsterdam The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe field of medical grade footwear is dynamic. Originally, a field where individual knowledge, expertise and skills determined the footwear and its outcomes, now becoming a more evidence‐based and data‐driven field with protocols and systems in place to create appropriate footwear. However, scientific evidence concerning medical grade footwear is still limited. Evidently, all stakeholders, from patients to pedorthists to rehabilitation physicians, will profit from a larger evidence‐base in this field. A widely supported research agenda is an essential first step to advance and facilitate new knowledge.MethodsWe formed a multidisciplinary team and followed the methodology from Dutch medical societies for the development of a research agenda on medical grade footwear. This consisted of seven steps: (1) inventory of relevant questions with users and professionals; (2) analyses of responses; (3) analyses of existing knowledge and evidence; (4) formulating research questions; (5) prioritising research questions by users and professionals; (6) finalising the research agenda and (7) implementing the research agenda.ResultsIn phase 1, 109 participants completed a survey, including 50% pedorthists, 6% rehabilitation physicians and 3% users. Participants provided 228 potential research questions. In phases 2–4, these were condensed to 65 research questions. In phase 5, 152 participants prioritised these 65 research questions, including 50% pedorthists, 13% rehabilitation physicians and 9% users. In phase 6, the final research agenda was created, with 26 research questions, categorised based on the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health ‘process description assistive devices’. In phase 7, an implementation meeting was held with over 50 stakeholders (including users and professionals), resulting in seven applications for research projects based on one or more research questions from the research agenda.ConclusionsThis research agenda structures and guides knowledge development within the field of medical grade footwear in the Netherlands and elsewhere. We expect that this will help to stimulate the field to tackle the research questions prioritised and with that to advance scientific knowledge in this field.