Can mindfulness‐based interventions improve outcomes in cognitive‐behavioural therapy for chronic insomnia disorder in the general population? Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

de Entrambasaguas Manuel1ORCID,Díaz‐Silveira Cintia2ORCID,Burgos‐Julián Francisco A.3ORCID,Santed Miguel A.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sleep Unit, Clinical Neurophysiology Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia Valencia Spain

2. Department of Psychology, Health of Sciences Campus Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Alcorcón Spain

3. Faculty of Psychology Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED) Madrid Spain

Abstract

AbstractCognitive‐behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT‐I) is the recommended first‐line therapy for adults with chronic insomnia disorder (ID), which is characterized by hyperarousal. Mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) are protocols aimed at stress reduction based on non‐judgmental attention control in the present moment. However, MBIs have been increasingly used without a clear scientific basis. The objective of this analysis was to examine if MBIs could be useful as a component of the CBT‐I therapeutic system through a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non‐randomized studies (NRS) searched in PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane and WoS. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was the primary outcome, while the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and a composite sleep variable (CSV) were secondary outcomes. Thirteen articles corresponding to nine studies (three pragmatic RCTs, three explanatory RCTs and three NRS) were included. The omnibus test found that MBIs had a small to medium effect size on ISI nearing signification when comparing active control groups in the pretest–posttest period [Δ = 0.44, p = 0.07], a medium, non‐significant, effect size on PSQI [Δ = 0.52, p = 0.18], and a significant though small effect size on CSV [Δ = 0.05, p < 0.01]. No heterogeneity was found. The analysis could not demonstrate that MBIs, combined with CBT‐I components in some studies, positively affected ID in the general adult population. This was probably due to the lack of pragmatic designs and suitable measuring instruments. Recommendations are made for designing further studies to address these issues.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3