Behavioral responses of mantled howler monkeys to neighbor long‐distance vocalizations

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesLong‐distance vocalizations are used by primates in a variety of contexts and may have different functions. The long‐distance vocalizations of howler monkeys (Alouatta spp.) underlie the spatial regulation of neighboring groups and could be associated with the defense of food resources. Here, we test the hypothesis that the behavioral responses of mantled howler monkeys (A. palliata) to neighbor long‐distance vocalizations are influenced by the potential for range defensibility while accounting for location within the home range and food availability.MethodsWe studied two groups for 13 months and a total of 888 h at La Flor de Catemaco (Mexico). Group 1 had a 92‐ha home range and Group 2 had a 24‐ha home range. We recorded vocalizations (N = 178 calls) and movements (N = 74 movements) of focal groups following long‐distance vocalizations produced by their neighbors.ResultsMovement responses, but not vocal responses, were predicted by range defensibility, location, and food availability. As predicted, the group living in the smaller and more defendable range showed stronger movement responses than the group in the larger home range. These movement responses had a shorter latency and longer duration in more valuable spatial and temporal contexts (i.e., the core area and during periods of low food availability).ConclusionsThese results suggest that the tradeoff between the costs and benefits of range defense varies according to the interactions between home range size and both the spatial (core areas) and temporal (food availability) abundance of resources. Thus, the responses of mantled howler monkeys to neighbor long‐distance vocalizations could be related to home range defensibility.