Enabling AI‐Generated Content for Gadolinium‐Free Contrast‐Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Author:

Wang Pingping12,Wang Hongyu3ORCID,Nie Pin1,Dang Yanli1,Liu Rumei1,Qu Mingzhu1,Wang Jiawei1,Mu Gengming1,Jia Tianju1,Shang Lei4,Zhu Kaiguo1,Feng Jun2,Chen Baoying1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital Northwest University Xi'an China

2. Department of Information Science & Technology Northwest University Xi'an China

3. Department of School of Computer Science & Technology Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications Xi'an China

4. Department of Health Statistics, School of Preventive Medicine Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an China

Abstract

BackgroundThere is increasing interest in utilizing AI‐generated content for gadolinium‐free contrast‐enhanced breast MRI.PurposeTo develop a generative model for gadolinium‐free contrast‐enhanced breast MRI and evaluate the diagnostic utility of the generated scans.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationTwo hundred seventy‐six women with 304 breast MRI examinations (49 ± 13 years, 243/61 for training/testing).Field Strength/SequenceZOOMit diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), T1‐weighted volumetric interpolated breath‐hold examination (T1W VIBE), and axial T2 3D SPACE at 3.0 T.AssessmentA generative model was developed to generate contrast‐enhanced scans using precontrast T1W VIBE and DWI images. The generated and real images were quantitatively compared using the structural similarity index (SSIM), mean absolute error (MAE), and Dice similarity coefficient. Three radiologists with 8, 5, and 5 years of experience independently rated the image quality and lesion visibility on AI‐generated and real images within various subgroups using a five‐point scale. Four breast radiologists, with 8, 8, 5, and 5 years of experience, independently and blindly interpreted four reading protocols: unenhanced MRI protocol alone and combined with AI‐generated scans, abbreviated MRI protocol, and full‐MRI protocol.Statistical AnalysisResults were assessed using t‐tests and McNemar tests. Using pathology diagnosis as reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each reading protocol. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.ResultsIn the test set, the generated images showed similarity to the real images (SSIM: 0.935 ± 0.047 [SD], MAE: 0.015 ± 0.012 [SD], and Dice coefficient: 0.726 ± 0.177 [SD]). No significant difference in lesion visibility was observed between real and AI‐generated scans of the mass, non‐mass, and benign lesion subgroups. Adding AI‐generated scans to the unenhanced MRI protocol slightly improved breast cancer detection (sensitivity: 92.86% vs. 85.71%, NPV: 76.92% vs. 70.00%); achieved non‐inferior diagnostic utility compared to the AB‐MRI protocol and full‐protocol (sensitivity: 92.86%, 95.24%; NPV: 75.00%, 81.82%).Data ConclusionAI‐generated gadolinium‐free contrast‐enhanced breast MRI has potential to improve the sensitivity of unenhanced MRI in detecting breast cancer.Evidence Level4Technical EfficacyStage 3

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3