Utilizing Radiomics of Peri‐Lesional Edema in T2FLAIR Subtraction Digital Images to Distinguish High‐Grade Glial Tumors From Brain Metastasis

Author:

Demirel Emin1ORCID,Dilek Okan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology Faculty of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar University of Health Sciences Afyonkarahisar Turkey

2. Department of Radiology Adana City Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Adana Turkey

Abstract

BackgroundDifferentiating high‐grade glioma (HGG) and isolated brain metastasis (BM) is important for determining appropriate treatment. Radiomics, utilizing quantitative imaging features, offers the potential for improved diagnostic accuracy in this context.PurposeTo differentiate high‐grade (grade 4) glioma and BM using machine learning models from radiomics data obtained from T2‐FLAIR digital subtraction images and the peritumoral edema area.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationThe study included 1287 patients. Of these, 602 were male and 685 were female. Of the 788 HGG patients included in the study, 702 had solitary masses. Of the 499 BM patients included in the study, 112 had solitary masses. Initially, the model was developed and tested on solitary masses. Subsequently, the model was developed and tested separately for all patients (solitary and multiple masses).Field Strength/SequenceAxial T2‐weighted fast spin‐echo sequence (T2WI) and T2‐weighted fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery sequence (T2‐FLAIR), using 1.5‐T and 3.0‐T scanners.AssessmentRadiomic features were extracted from digitally subtracted T2‐FLAIR images in the area of peritumoral edema. The maximum relevance‐minimum redundancy (mRMR) method was then used for dimensionality reduction. The naive Bayes algorithm was used in model development. The interpretability of the model was explored using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).Statistical TestsChi‐square test, one‐way analysis of variance, and Kruskal–Wallis test were performed. The P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The performance metrics include area under curve (AUC), sensitivity (SENS), and specificity (SPEC).ResultsThe mean age of HGG patients was 61.4 ± 13.2 years and 61.7 ± 12.2 years for BM patients. In the external validation cohort, the model achieved AUC: 0.991, SENS: 0.983, and SPEC: 0.922. The external cohort results for patients with solitary lesions were AUC: 0.987, SENS: 0.950, and SPEC: 0.922.Data ConclusionThe artificial intelligence model, developed with radiomics data from the peritumoral edema area in T2‐FLAIR digital subtraction images, might be able to differentiate isolated BM from HGG.Evidence Level3Technical EfficacyStage 2

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3