State‐of‐the‐Art Quantification of Liver Iron With MRI—Vendor Implementation and Available Tools

Author:

Tipirneni‐Sajja Aaryani12ORCID,Shrestha Utsav12,Esparza Juan1,Morin Cara E.34ORCID,Kannengiesser Stephan5,Roberts Nathan T.6,Peeters Johannes M.7,Sharma Samir D.8,Hu Houchun H.9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Engineering The University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee USA

2. Diagnostic Imaging St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA

3. Department of Radiology Cincinnati Children's Hospital Cincinnati Ohio USA

4. Department of Radiology University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA

5. MR Applications Predevelopment Siemens Healthineers AG Erlangen Germany

6. MR Clinical Solutions & Research Collaborations GE HealthCare Waukesha Wisconsin USA

7. MR Clinical Science Philips Best The Netherlands

8. Canon Medical Research USA, Inc. Mayfield Village Ohio USA

9. Radiology University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

The role of MRI to estimate liver iron concentration (LIC) for identifying patients with iron overload and guiding the titration of chelation therapy is increasingly established for routine clinical practice. However, the existence of multiple MRI‐based LIC quantification techniques limits standardization and widespread clinical adoption. In this article, we review the existing and widely accepted MRI‐based LIC estimation methods at 1.5 T and 3 T: signal intensity ratio (SIR) and relaxometry (R2 and R2*) and discuss the basic principles, acquisition and analysis protocols, and MRI‐LIC calibrations for each technique. Further, we provide an up‐to‐date information on MRI vendor implementations and available offline commercial and free software for each MRI‐based LIC quantification approach. We also briefly review the emerging and advanced MRI techniques for LIC estimation and their current limitations for clinical use. Lastly, we discuss the implications of MRI‐based LIC measurements on clinical use and decision‐making in the management of patients with iron overload. Some of the key highlights from this review are as follows: 1) Both R2 and R2* can estimate accurate and reproducible LIC, when validated acquisition parameters and analysis protocols are applied, 2) Although the Ferriscan R2 method has been widely used, recent consensus and guidelines endorse R2*‐MRI as the most accurate and reproducible method for LIC estimation, 3) Ongoing efforts aim to establish R2*‐MRI as the standard approach for quantifying LIC, and 4) Emerging R2*‐MRI techniques employ radial sampling strategies and offer improved motion compensation and broader dynamic range for LIC estimation.Evidence Level1Technical EfficacyStage 2

Funder

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3