Surveillance of PFAS in sludge and biosolids at 12 water resource recovery facilities

Author:

Oza Shubhashini1ORCID,Bell Katherine Y.2,Xu Zhiliang3,Wang Yifei4ORCID,Wells Martha J. M.5,Norton John W.6,Winchell Lloyd J.7,Huang Qingguo4,Li Hui3

Affiliation:

1. Brown and Caldwell Charlotte North Carolina USA

2. Brown and Caldwell Nashville Tennessee USA

3. Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

4. Department of Crop and Soil Science University of Georgia Griffin Georgia USA

5. EnviroChem Services Cookeville Tennessee USA

6. Great Lakes Water Authority Detroit Michigan USA

7. Brown and Caldwell Saint Paul Minnesota USA

Abstract

AbstractPer‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are refractory anthropogenic chemicals and current treatment processes at municipal water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) cannot efficiently degrade them, hence, these chemicals cycle through the environment. Certain PFAS can be concentrated in biosolids from WRRFs and are commonly land applied for beneficial reuse. Given recent advances in measurement of PFAS, documentation of the range of concentrations in pre‐stabilized sludge and stabilized biosolids is critical to evaluating treatment best practices and assessing potential human health and ecological risks. In this study, pre‐stabilized sludge and post‐stabilized biosolids samples were collected from 12 major WRRFs across the United States. PFAS were analyzed using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method SW846‐3500C/537.1, and Draft EPA Method 1633, by one commercial laboratory and two university research laboratories, respectively. Results comparison among laboratories demonstrated statistical differences in PFAS concentrations among split samples. For example, 5:3 FTCA (fluorotelomer carboxylic acid) concentrations in post‐stabilized sludge at Lab 1 were measured at 21 ng/g (dry), while they were detected at 151 ng/g (dry) in Lab 3. Further, higher PFAS concentrations were observed in post‐stabilized biosolids compared to pre‐stabilized sludges, regardless of the laboratory or analysis method, even when solids destruction through solids stabilization was considered. Further research is required to refine methods for analyses of PFAS in sludge and biosolids samples from WRRFs prior to being used for development of regulatory actions as well as understanding how various treatment protocols could impact concentrations of PFAS in land‐applied biosolids.

Funder

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3