Toward a more patient‐centered drug development process in clinical trials for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): Practical considerations from the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS)

Author:

Efficace Fabio1ORCID,Buckstein Rena2,Abel Gregory A.3,Giesinger Johannes M.4,Fenaux Pierre5,Bewersdorf Jan Philipp6,Brunner Andrew M.7,Bejar Rafael8,Borate Uma9,DeZern Amy E.10,Greenberg Peter11,Roboz Gail J.12,Savona Michael R.13,Sparano Francesco1ORCID,Boultwood Jacqueline14,Komrokji Rami15,Sallman David A.15,Xie Zhuoer15ORCID,Sanz Guillermo16,Carraway Hetty E.17,Taylor Justin18,Nimer Stephen D.18,Della Porta Matteo Giovanni19,Santini Valeria20,Stahl Maximilian21,Platzbecker Uwe22,Sekeres Mikkael A.18,Zeidan Amer M.23

Affiliation:

1. Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Health Outcomes Research Unit GIMEMA Data Center Rome Italy

2. Department of Medical Oncology/Hematology Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Divisions of Population Sciences and Hematologic Malignancies Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

4. University Hospital of Psychiatry II Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

5. Hôpital Saint Louis Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris and Paris Cité University Paris France

6. Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

7. Leukemia Program, Harvard Medical School Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts USA

8. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Moores Cancer Center UC San Diego La Jolla California USA

9. Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center/James Cancer Hospital Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

10. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore Maryland USA

11. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Cancer Institute Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

12. Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital New York New York USA

13. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA

14. Blood Cancer UK Molecular Haematology Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK

15. Department of Malignant Hematology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA

16. Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe Valencia Spain

17. Leukemia Program, Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

18. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

19. Department of Biomedical Sciences IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center & Humanitas University Milan Italy

20. Myelodysplastic Syndromes Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi University of Florence Florence Italy

21. Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

22. Department of Hematology and Cellular Therapy University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig Germany

23. Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine Yale University School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center New Haven Connecticut USA

Abstract

AbstractNotable treatment advances have been made in recent years for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS), and several new drugs are under development. For example, the emerging availability of oral MDS therapies holds the promise of improving patients' health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Within this rapidly evolving landscape, the inclusion of HRQoL and other patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) is critical to inform the benefit/risk assessment of new therapies or to assess whether patients live longer and better, for what will likely remain a largely incurable disease. We provide practical considerations to support investigators in generating high‐quality PRO data in future MDS trials. We first describe several challenges that are to be thoughtfully considered when designing an MDS‐focused clinical trial with a PRO endpoint. We then discuss aspects related to the design of the study, including PRO assessment strategies. We also discuss statistical approaches illustrating the potential value of time‐to‐event analyses and their implications within the estimand framework. Finally, based on a literature review of MDS randomized controlled trials with a PRO endpoint, we note the PRO items that deserve special attention when reporting future MDS trial results. We hope these practical considerations will facilitate the generation of rigorous PRO data that can robustly inform MDS patient care and support treatment decision‐making for this patient population.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3