Periodontal regeneration risk assessment in the treatment of intrabony defects

Author:

Levine Robert A.1,Saleh Muhammad H. A.2,Dias Debora R.3,Ganeles Jeffrey4,Araújo Maurício G.3,Renouard Franck5,Pinsky Harold M.6,Miller Preston D.7,Wang Hom‐Lay2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Periodontology and Implantology Temple University Kornberg School of Dentistry Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

3. Department of Dentistry State University of Maringá Maringá Paraná Brazil

4. Department of Periodontology Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine Ft. Lauderdale Florida USA

5. Private Practice in Paris France

6. Private Practice in Ann Arbor Michigan USA

7. Department of Stomatology, Division of Periodontics Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRegenerative approaches performed in periodontics seems to be efficient in treating intrabony defects. There are, however, many factors that may affect the predictability of the regenerative procedures. The present article aimed to propose a new risk assessment tool for treating periodontal intrabony defects by regenerative therapy.MethodsDifferent variables that could affect the success of a regenerative procedure were considered based on their impact on (i) the wound healing potential, promoting wound stability, cells, and angiogenesis, or (ii) the ability to clean the root surface and maintain an optimal plaque control or (iii) aesthetics (risk for gingival recession).ResultsThe risk assessment variables were divided into a patient, tooth, defect, and operator level. Patient‐related factors included medical conditions such as diabetes, smoking habit, plaque control, compliance with supportive care, and expectations. Tooth‐related factors included prognosis, traumatic occlusal forces or mobility, endodontic status, root surface topography, soft tissue anatomy, and gingival phenotype. Defect‐associated factors included local anatomy (number of residual bone walls, width, and depth), furcation involvement, cleansability, and number of sides of the root involved. Operator‐related factors should not be neglected and included the clinician's level of experience, the presence of environmental stress factors, and the use of checklists in the daily routine.ConclusionsUsing a risk assessment comprised of patient‐, tooth‐, defect‐ and operator‐level factors can aid the clinician in identifying challenging characteristics and in the treatment decision process.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3