Effect of a transitional care model following hospitalization for heart failure: 3‐year outcomes of the Patient‐Centered Care Transitions in Heart Failure (PACT‐HF) randomized controlled trial

Author:

Averbuch Tauben1,Lee Shun Fu2,Zagorski Brandon3,Mebazaa Alexandre4,Fonarow Gregg C.5,Thabane Lehana67,Van Spall Harriette G.C.268ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada

2. Population Health Research Institute Hamilton ON Canada

3. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada

4. Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care–APHP AM: Université Paris Cité; MASCOT Inserm Paris France

5. Division of Cardiology, Ahmanson‐UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center University of California Los Angeles Medical Center Los Angeles CA USA

6. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

7. The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton ON Canada

8. Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada

Abstract

AbstractAimsPatients are at high risk of death or readmission following hospitalization for heart failure (HF). We tested the effect of a transitional care model that included month‐long nurse‐led home visits and long‐term heart function clinic visits ‐ with services titrated to estimated risk of clinical events ‐ on 3‐year outcomes following hospitalization.Methods and resultsIn a pragmatic, stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial, 10 hospitals were randomized to the intervention versus usual care. The primary outcome was a composite of all‐cause death, readmission, or emergency department (ED) visit. Secondary outcomes included components of the primary composite outcomes, HF readmissions and healthcare resource utilization. There were 2494 patients (50.4% female) with mean age of 77.7 years. The primary outcome was reached in 1040 (94.2%) patients in the intervention and 1314 (94.5%) in the usual care group at 3 years. The intervention did not reduce the risk of the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81–1.05) nor the component outcomes overall, although numerically reduced the risk of ED visits in women but not men (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63–1.00 vs. HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80–1.19; sex‐treatment interaction p = 0.23). The uptake of guideline‐directed medical therapy was no different with the intervention than with usual care, with the exception of sacubitril/valsartan, which increased with the intervention (3.3% vs 1.5%; relative risk 6.2, 95% CI 1.92–20.06).ConclusionsMore than 9 of 10 patients hospitalized for HF experienced all‐cause death, readmission, or ED visit at 3 years. A transitional care model with services titrated to risk did not improve the composite of these endpoints, likely because there were no major differences in uptake of medical therapies between the groups.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02112227.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Roche Diagnostics

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3