Whole‐tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the application of whole‐tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram metrics for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEA).MethodsPreoperative MRI of 502 EEA patients were retrospectively analyzed. Whole tumor ADC histogram analysis was performed with regions of interest drawn on all tumor slices of diffusion‐weighted imaging scans. Risk stratification was based on ESMO‐ESTRO‐ESP guidelines: low‐, intermediate‐, high‐intermediate‐, and high‐risk. Univariable analysis was used to compare ADC histogram metrics (tumor volume, minADC, maxADC, and meanADC; 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of ADC [recorded as P10, P25, P50, P75, and P90 ADC, respectively]; skewness; and kurtosis) between different risk EEAs, and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the optimal metric or combined model for risk stratifications. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with the area under the curve (AUC) was used for diagnostic performance evaluation.ResultsA decreasing tendency in multiple ADC values was observed from the low‐ to high‐intermediate‐risk EEAs. The (low + intermediate)‐risk EEAs and low‐risk EEAs had significantly smaller tumor volumes and higher minADCs, meanADCs, P10, P25, P50, P75, and P90 ADCs than the (high‐intermediate + high)‐risk EEAs and non‐low‐risk EEAs (all P < 0.05), respectively. The combined models of the (meanADC + volume) and the (P75 ADC + volume) yielded the largest AUCs of 0.775 and 0.780 in identifying the (low + intermediate)‐ and the low‐risk EEAs from the other EEAs, respectively.ConclusionWhole‐tumor ADC histogram metrics might be helpful for preoperatively identifying low‐ and (low + intermediate)‐risk EEAs, facilitating personalized therapeutic planning.