Deep learning‐based automatic pipeline for quantitative assessment of thigh muscle morphology and fatty infiltration

Author:

Gaj Sibaji12ORCID,Eck Brendan L.123ORCID,Xie Dongxing12,Lartey Richard12,Lo Charlotte12,Zaylor William12,Yang Mingrui12ORCID,Nakamura Kunio12,Winalski Carl S.123,Spindler Kurt P.14,Li Xiaojuan123

Affiliation:

1. Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

2. Department of Biomedical Engineering Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

3. Department of Radiology Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

4. Department of Orthopaedics Cleveland Clinic Florida Region Weston Florida USA

Abstract

PurposeFast and accurate thigh muscle segmentation from MRI is important for quantitative assessment of thigh muscle morphology and composition. A novel deep learning (DL) based thigh muscle and surrounding tissues segmentation model was developed for fully automatic and reproducible cross‐sectional area (CSA) and fat fraction (FF) quantification and tested in patients at 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.MethodsA DL model combining UNet and DenseNet was trained and tested using manually segmented thighs from 16 patients (32 legs). Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). A UNet model was trained for comparison. These segmentations were used to obtain CSA and FF quantification. Reproducibility of CSA and FF quantification was tested with scan and rescan of six healthy subjects.ResultsThe proposed UNet and DenseNet had high agreement with manual segmentation (DSC >0.97, ASSD < 0.24) and improved performance compared with UNet. For hamstrings of the operated knee, the automated pipeline had largest absolute difference of 6.01% for CSA and 0.47% for FF as compared to manual segmentation. In reproducibility analysis, the average difference (absolute) in CSA quantification between scan and rescan was better for the automatic method as compared with manual segmentation (2.27% vs. 3.34%), whereas the average difference (absolute) in FF quantification were similar.ConclusionsThe proposed method exhibits excellent accuracy and reproducibility in CSA and FF quantification compared with manual segmentation and can be used in large‐scale patient studies.

Funder

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3