Bycatch reduction devices exclude diamondback terrapins and maintain blue crab catch in two Virginia tidal creeks

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe diamondback terrapin Malaclemys terrapin is frequently caught as bycatch in both commercial and recreational blue crab Callinectes sapidus fisheries throughout its range along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of North America. Bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) are plastic or wire rectangles mounted in the entrance funnels of crab traps, designed to exclude terrapins while still allowing crabs to enter. In this study conducted in two tidal creeks in Virginia, USA, we assessed the effectiveness of four BRD designs, including two novel oval designs, against control traps with no BRDs.MethodsWe tested four replicates of each of the five trap treatments (1.75‐inch oval BRD, 2‐inch oval BRD, 1.75‐inch rectangular BRD, 2‐inch rectangular BRD, and a control trap without a BRD) in each tidal creek, for a total of 20 traps per creek and 40 traps total. We fitted traps with wire chimneys that extended above the high tide water line to allow trapped terrapins to surface for air. For eight weeks during summer 2021, we baited traps with Atlantic Menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus each day, beginning on Monday. Tuesday–Friday, we emptied traps of any animals inside, and recorded terrapin sex, terrapin carapace length, terrapin carapace width, and terrapin shell height, as well as blue crab carapace length.ResultWe found that all four BRD designs were highly effective at excluding terrapins and maintaining crab catch when compared to control traps. We found a significant difference (p = 0.003) in catch per unit effort (CPUE) of diamondback terrapins among treatments, with the control group (those without BRDs) having the highest CPUE (0.97 ± 0.18). All traps fitted with BRDs decreased terrapin capture significantly compared to the control group. Oval BRDs excluded more terrapins than their rectangular counterparts with the same height dimension, although these differences were not significant. We found no significant difference in CPUE of blue crabs among treatments (p = 0.392), or in the size of legal crabs caught in each treatment (p = 0.216).ConclusionThis study provides evidence of the effectiveness of both rectangular and oval‐shaped BRDs to exclude terrapins and maintain crab catch in Virginia waters, where BRDs are not currently required.