Economic evaluation of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis from the APPAC randomized clinical trial

Author:

Sippola S12,Grönroos J12,Tuominen R345,Paajanen H67,Rautio T8,Nordström P9,Aarnio M10,Rantanen T1112,Hurme S13,Salminen P12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

2. Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

3. Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

4. Primary Health Care Unit, Hospital District of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland

5. University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia

6. Department of Surgery, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Mikkeli, Finland

7. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland

8. Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

9. Division of Surgery, Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

10. Department of Surgery, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland

11. Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

12. Department of Surgery, Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Seinäjoki, Finland

13. Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

Abstract

Abstract Background An increasing amount of evidence supports antibiotic therapy for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The objective of this study was to compare the costs of antibiotics alone versus appendicectomy in treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis within the randomized controlled APPAC (APPendicitis ACuta) trial. Methods The APPAC multicentre, non-inferiority RCT was conducted on patients with CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Patients were assigned randomly to appendicectomy or antibiotic treatment. All costs were recorded, whether generated by the initial visit and subsequent treatment or possible recurrent appendicitis during the 1-year follow-up. The cost estimates were based on cost levels for the year 2012. Results Some 273 patients were assigned to the appendicectomy group and 257 to antibiotic treatment. Most patients randomized to antibiotic treatment did not require appendicectomy during the 1-year follow-up. In the operative group, overall societal costs (€5989·2, 95 per cent c.i. 5787·3 to 6191·1) were 1·6 times higher (€2244·8, 1940·5 to 2549·1) than those in the antibiotic group (€3744·4, 3514·6 to 3974·2). In both groups, productivity losses represented a slightly higher proportion of overall societal costs than all treatment costs together, with diagnostics and medicines having a minor role. Those in the operative group were prescribed significantly more sick leave than those in the antibiotic group (mean(s.d.) 17·0(8·3) (95 per cent c.i. 16·0 to 18·0) versus 9·2(6·9) (8·3 to 10·0) days respectively; P < 0·001). When the age and sex of the patient as well as the hospital were controlled for simultaneously, the operative treatment generated significantly more costs in all models. Conclusion Patients receiving antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis incurred lower costs than those who had surgery.

Funder

Turku University Hospital government research grant

Mary and Georg C. Ehrnrooth Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3