A single‐center retrospective analysis of prognoses in patients with melanoma brain metastases and effectiveness of treatment in Japan

Author:

Wada Shogo1ORCID,Ogata Dai1,Kashihara Tairo2ORCID,Okuma Kae2,Eto Hirofumi13,Nakano Eiji1,Takahashi Akira14,Namikawa Kenjiro1ORCID,Igaki Hiroshi2ORCID,Yamazaki Naoya1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatologic Oncology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan

2. Department of Radiation Oncology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan

3. Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine University of Miyazaki Hospital Miyazaki Japan

4. Department of Dermatologic Oncology National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMelanoma brain metastasis (MBM) has a poor prognosis, although recent treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy, have improved the prognosis. However, these systemic therapies have been reported to be less efficient for Asian patients. We investigated the survival of Asian patients with MBM and the effectiveness of systemic therapies.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the survival rates of patients diagnosed with MBM between January 2011 and December 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan. In addition, we identified factors associated with survival using Cox regression analysis.ResultsA total of 135 patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) after an MBM diagnosis was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.1–9.6). The 6‐month and 1‐year survival rates were 60.7% and 34.8%, respectively. We identified the prognostic factors of MBM, including non‐acral primary location, low serum LDH levels, systemic therapy of single‐agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or targeted therapies (TTs), and radiotherapy of stereotactic irradiation (STI). We found no significant difference in effectiveness between single‐agent ICIs, the combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab (COMBI‐ICI), and TTs (COMBI‐ICI vs. single‐agent ICI, hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.27–1.88, p = 0.49; COMBI‐ICI vs. TT: hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.14–1.55, p = 0.21).ConclusionsSystemic therapy and radiotherapy have improved the survival of MBM patients, but the survival of Asian patients remains poor. Our findings suggest that COMBI‐ICIs are not significantly more effective than single‐agent ICI or TT in treating MBM.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3