Digital futures in mind: Why lived experience collaboration must guide digital mental health technologies

Author:

Gilbert Kellie1,Muchamore Ian123,Katterl Simon4,Purdon Hayley5,Allen Andy6,Ozols Ingrid7ORCID,Gooding Piers8

Affiliation:

1. University of Melbourne (Melbourne Law School) Carlton Victoria Australia

2. Australian National University (Centre for Mental Health Research) Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

3. University of Edinburgh (Centre for Biomedicine Self and Society) Edinburgh UK

4. Simon Katterl Consulting Brunswick West Victoria Australia

5. University of New England (School of Health) Armidale New South Wales Australia

6. Switchboard Victoria Melbourne Victoria Australia

7. mentalhealth@work Melbourne Australia

8. La Trobe Law School Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractDigital mental health technologies and services are here. More are coming. Such technologies and services present both risks and opportunities. At their best, they may enhance the most humane, communal and caring parts of our social systems and communities. At their worst, they may reinforce reductionist approaches to distress and crisis, increase surveillance and control, as well as extracting data and wealth from people seeking care. In this paper, we argue that lived experience‐led governance and collaborative development of these technologies and services will enhance the best opportunities and mitigate against the biggest risks. This paper provides a commentary emerging from work by authors with lived experience, and those without, that explored accountability in digital mental health technologies and services. The commentary offers guidance to anyone interested in supporting lived experience‐led, and collaborative governance of, digital mental health technologies. This guidance, drawing on interdisciplinary and lived experience‐led research and grey literature, assists readers in understanding why collaboration should take place, when, where and with whom, on what issues this could start, and how collaborators should approach this.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference73 articles.

1. Australian Human Rights Commission. (2022)Position paper: A Human Rights Act for Australia. Australian Human Rights Commission.

2. Income‐based inequities in access to psychotherapy and other mental health services in Canada and Australia;Bartram M.;Health Policy,2019

3. Designed to clash? Reflecting on the practical, personal, and structural challenges of collaborative research in psychiatry;Beeker T.;Frontiers in Psychiatry,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3