Adjuvant chemotherapy non‐adherence, patient‐centered communication, and patient‐level factors in elderly breast and colon cancer patients

Author:

Mitchell Kerri‐Anne R.1ORCID,Boyle Joseph R.2,Juricekova Lenka3,Brown Richard F.3

Affiliation:

1. Public Health Program Austin College Sherman Texas USA

2. Department of Biostatistics Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond Virginia USA

3. Department of Health Behavior and Policy Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWe examined patient‐level factors (patient characteristics, disease and treatment factors, and patient experience), patient‐centered communication (PCCM), and non‐adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) guidelines among breast and colon cancer patients to inform AC adherence promotion and improve clinical outcomes.MethodsDescriptive statistics for patient‐level factors, PCCM, and AC non‐adherence (primary non‐adherence, non‐persistence at 3 and 6 months) were obtained. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate AC non‐adherence after accounting for the identified patient‐level factors.ResultsThe majority of the sample (n = 577) were White (87%), breast cancer patients (87%), and reported PCCM (provider communication score ≥ 90%, 73%, provider communication score = 100%, 58%). All three levels of AC nonadherence were significantly higher in breast cancer patients (69%, 81%, and 89% for primary non‐adherence, and non‐persistence at 3 and 6 months, respectively) than colon cancer patients (43%, 46%, and 62%, respectively). Male sex, survey assistance, and low/average ratings of a personal doctor, specialist, and healthcare were associated with lower PCCM. Older age, breast cancer diagnosis, and diagnosis group following 2007–2009 increased the likelihood of all three levels of AC non‐adherence. Comorbidities and PCCM‐90 were exclusively associated with non‐persistence at 3 months.ConclusionsAdjuvant chemotherapy non‐adherence varied by cancer diagnosis and treatment factors. The relationship between PCCM and AC non‐adherence differed by level of PCCM, time period, and the presence of comorbidities. AC guideline adherence, communication, and value‐concordant treatment should be assessed and compared simultaneously to improve our understanding of their interrelationships.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3