Affiliation:
1. Biometrics Department Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd Chuo‐ku Tokyo Japan
2. Department of Biostatistics Yokohama City University School of Medicine Yokohama Kanagawa Japan
3. Department of Information Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology Tokyo University of Science Chiba Japan
Abstract
ABSTRACTIn oncology, Phase II studies are crucial for clinical development plans as such studies identify potent agents with sufficient activity to continue development in the subsequent Phase III trials. Traditionally, Phase II studies are single‐arm studies, with the primary endpoint being short‐term treatment efficacy. However, drug safety is also an important consideration. In the context of such multiple‐outcome designs, predictive probability‐based Bayesian monitoring strategies have been developed to assess whether a clinical trial will provide enough evidence to continue with a Phase III study at the scheduled end of the trial. Therefore, we propose a new simple index vector to summarize the results that cannot be captured by existing strategies. Specifically, we define the worst and most promising situations for the potential effect of a treatment, then use the proposed index vector to measure the deviation between the two situations. Finally, simulation studies are performed to evaluate the operating characteristics of the design. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed method makes appropriate interim go/no‐go decisions.