Influence of Different Application Modes of a Universal Adhesive System on the Bond Strength of Bulk‐Fill Composite Resin to Enamel and Dentin in Primary Teeth

Author:

Nozari Ali1,Pakniyat Jahromi Maryam1,Haji Abbas Oghli Farnaz1,Jowkar Zahra2ORCID,Hamidi Seyed Ahmadreza3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz Iran

2. Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz Iran

3. Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz Iran

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesThe objective of this study was to assess how the application mode of a universal adhesive system affects the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of bulk‐fill and conventional composite resins to enamel and dentin in primary teeth.MethodsA total of 80 caries‐free primary second molars were randomly assigned to eight experimental groups (n = 10) based on the bonding substrate (enamel or dentin), the application mode of the universal adhesive system (etch and rinse [E&R], or self‐etch [SE]), and the type of composite resin used (bulk‐fill or conventional). After bonding the composite resin to enamel or dentin, the μSBS of the bonded composite resins was measured.ResultsThe mean μSBS value of bulk‐fill composite resin was significantly higher than that of conventional composite resin for both enamel and dentin substrates, regardless of the application mode (p < 0.001). An interaction effect between the bonding substrate and the application mode of the adhesive system was observed, indicating a significant relationship (p < 0.001). The highest μSBS values for primary teeth enamel were achieved using the E&R mode with bulk‐fill composite resin, while for dentin specimens, the SE mode with bulk‐fill composite resin yielded the highest μSBS values. The μSBS of the E&R group was significantly higher than that of the SE group for enamel specimens (p < 0.001), whereas the μSBS of the SE group was significantly higher than that of the E&R group for dentin specimens (p < 0.001).ConclusionBulk‐fill composite resin demonstrated higher μSBS in comparison to conventional composite resin. The universal adhesive system exhibited superior performance in the SE mode compared to the E&R mode on primary dentin. Pre‐etching the enamel before the application of the universal adhesive enhanced the μSBS to primary teeth enamel, highlighting the importance of selectively acid etching the enamel of primary teeth.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3