Sedative effects of propofol and risk factors for excessive sedation in the endoscopic treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases

Author:

Maruki Yuta12ORCID,Hijioka Susumu1,Yagi Shin1,Takasaki Tetsuro1,Chatto Mark13,Fukuda Soma1,Yamashige Daiki1,Okamoto Kouhei1,Agarie Daiki1,Hara Hidenobu1,Hagiwara Yuya1,Nagashio Yoshikuni1,Morizane Chigusa1,Sone Miyuki4,Okusaka Takuji1,Saito Yutaka5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan

2. Molecular Oncology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

3. Department of Gastroenterology Makati Medical Center Makati City Philippines

4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan

5. Endoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe safety and effectiveness of propofol in more complex endoscopic procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, remain unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate propofol sedation during endoscopic cholangiopancreatography, ultrasound‐guided intervention, and gastroduodenal stenting and examine risk factors for excessive sedation.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 870 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment with propofol sedation for biliary and pancreatic disease between October 2020 and September 2021. Sedation included propofol and fentanyl, with continuous monitoring of vital signs and the bispectral index. The assessed risk factors included age, complications, body mass index, treatment duration, and specialty.ResultsDistal bile duct treatment (n = 367), hilar bile duct treatment (n = 197), post‐small‐intestinal reconstruction treatment (n = 75), endoscopic ultrasound‐guided intervention (n = 140), and gastrointestinal obstruction treatment (n = 91) were performed. The rates of excessive sedation, hypoxemia, and hypotension were 7.8%, 6.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. Post‐small‐intestinal reconstruction treatment had the highest incidence rate of excessive sedation (16%), whereas endoscopic ultrasound‐guided intervention had the lowest incidence rate (4.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between excessive sedation and comorbid sleep apnea, obesity, and prolonged procedural time.ConclusionsObesity, sleep apnea syndrome, and prolonged procedure time are risk factors for excessive sedation related to propofol use. Thus, sedation techniques should be tailored for these patients.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3