Perspectives on stakeholder participation in the design of economic experiments for agricultural policymaking: Pros, cons, and twelve recommendations for researchers

Author:

Höhler Julia1,Barreiro‐Hurlé Jesús2,Czajkowski Mikołaj3,Dessart François J.2,Ferraro Paul J.4,Li Tongzhe5,Messer Kent D.6,Palm‐Forster Leah6,Termansen Mette7,Thomas Fabian8,Zagórska Katarzyna3,Zemo Kahsay Haile7,Rommel Jens9

Affiliation:

1. Business Economics Group Wageningen University Wageningen Netherlands

2. European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) Seville Spain

3. Faculty of Economic Sciences University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

4. Carey Business School, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA

5. Department of Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics University of Guelph Guelph Canada

6. Department of Applied Economics and Statistics University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA

7. Department of Food and Resource Economics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

8. Department of Environmental Economics Osnabrueck University Osnabrueck Germany

9. Department of Economics Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden

Abstract

AbstractEconomic experiments have emerged as a powerful tool for agricultural policy evaluations. In this perspective, we argue that involving stakeholders in the design of economic experiments is critical to satisfy mandates for evidence‐based policies and encourage policymakers' usage of experimental results. To identify advantages and disadvantages of involving stakeholders when designing experiments, we synthesize observations from six experiments in Europe and North America. In these experiments, the primary advantage was the ability to learn within realistic decision environments and thus make relevant policy recommendations. Disadvantages include complicated implementation and constraints on treatment design. We compile 12 recommendations for researchers.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Development

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3